Skip navigation

Tag Archives: Business

During our earnings call yesterday, it daunted on my how connected I am on the public sector. Here was two extremely important businessmen, our CEO and CFO, discussing our earnings and statistics, and I kept thinking “I hope I calculated everything right.”

My main contribution to our company is the constant currency impacts. It was never such a big issues until this time last year, when the US dollar was strengthening and we were getting hurt by our currency impacts. Now, everything we post externally has a constant currency impact associated with it.

This quarter, we were lucky enough to have “help” due to currency impacts. Certain business units had a loss, and that loss wasn’t so bad as it showed because the currency rates helped us out a bit. So I’m not sure if that will make it more or less scrutinized then any other situation.

So during this call, I hear all of my numbers being called out directly. Which is somewhat nerve-racking, especially when the investors start their barrage of questions after the scripted call. I have to admit that our CFO has a gift when having to deal with the pressure of these calls. What he says will be torn to shreds, analyzed, and dissected countless times over the next few months. We are also watching, as I’m sure he is too, our stock price during the call. Luckily, it marginally dropped, and has since been flat.

Overall, it’s been a good 5 months for me here, and I’m excited to learn the things that I have. Being in the public eye is a bit strange at times, but a good learning experience. Hopefully with the future will be as bright, and I can day take the call instead of listening to it nervously.

Really, cash for clunkers? I understand that at the current economic condition, many of us are tightening our belts, and we are hoping something “too good to be true” to come knocking on our door. But this does really seem “too good to be true,” especially since we’re just putting our country into even more debt. With all the crisis around, hunger, war, povery, financial crimes, etc., is our answer to go out and buy a new car?

Now that the government decided to bail more people out, and increase the budget, let’s see if we see if we get the same population of people in mortgage debt to now get into auto debt. Isn’t this the same thing? Helping those who “can’t” afford to, a way to “almost afford to?”

I’m really getting tired of people blaming AIG already. It’s been proven that they did not break any laws, but continuing to dwell on the subject has gotten old. Rep. Barney Frank just called for the federal government to do a take-over of AIG and try to make it easier to get back the some of the $165 million it paid the execs. Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer wants Congress to tax the HELL out of the bonuses, something like 90%?! My personal favorite is how Republican Sen. Charles Grassley wants the AIG executives to either resign or commit suicide.

During President Obama’s campaign and a large chunk of the first 60 days of his presidency, he has shown patience and determination in keeping his eyes on the prize of two major economic goals: creating around 4 million jobs and getting credit going again. True, the plunging of the country’s financial crapper is taking longer than everyone wants, but I’m willing to give him some breathing room on that one, because that’s a pretty big piece of crap to drain overnight. However, Obama seems to have taken his eye off the ball a little bit and gotten pulled into the publicity. It seems that the plan isn’t to pull the economy from the bottomless pit of port-o-potty’s, but to point some fingers on who we think got us into this crap. We gave billions of taxpayer dollars to AIG, and the company has the balls to pay out huge bonuses to the execs, because you know they’re hurting too!

Now I get that AIG had some contractual obligations to these execs, and it was either pay up to get sued, but shouldn’t we set a restriction that voids these types of contracts if the government is forced to step in and bail them out? Shouldn’t the government hear the full plan on what happens with the money they just forked over? I guess that’s another thing for the Prez to think about.

Being in finance, I often field a lot of questions about the various markets.  One of the most repetitive questions I’ve heard is, “what happens of the stocks keep going down?”

Well there are various answers to this.  When you enter the market, you often answer questions about how conservative or aggressive you want to be.  If you are conservative in nature, then you may want to cash out and minimize your loss, but the wise investor knows this isn’t the best action.  Cashing out now will minimize your current loss.  It will stop your value from going down further and you can choose to do something else with your money.  The problem is that the values will go back up.  It most likely will take 1-3 years to fully bounce back, but it most assuredly will happen.

There is a really great statement used for investing, if you need the money within the next 5 years, then the stock market is probably not for you.  A person came to me a few months ago saying that she had $5,000 and she needed $15,000.  She wanted to know how to invest quickly to get to that amount within 6 months.  If anybody knew the answer to that, they’d be a mega-millionaire just by selling that secret alone.  EVERYONE wants to get the most amount of return in the shortest amount of time.  Truth is that it can’t be done.  Not without gambling and risking the entire amount that you are investing.  I’m sure people have done it, but if they tried to do it again, they’d fail.  If they tried it again 100 times, they’d fail.

Another question I get is they want to start an on-line business with no start-up capital, only takes a minimal amount of time, and can replace their entire income so they can only work part-time from now on.  Yeah, well I love pigs and even if I super-glued their wings on, I’d never throw it out a window and ask it to fly.  Starting a company takes more time then working a normal job.  You end up living the job and must bootstrap for a period of time just to get by.  You often have to give up benefits, vacation, and your 401K until the company really takes off and can sustain that extra expense.  Even if you happen to have a fantastic idea, the work you need to do to get started is like working two jobs.

Also, never take shortcuts!!  Just seeing the amount of foreclosure, job losses, portfolio declines, lay-offs, etc. should be enough to get you really interested in how to become secure in your finances.  Adjustable rate mortgages, not diversifying your portfolio, and not saving money are just a few of the many mistakes we need to learn from.

Nobody is perfect, and even the best financiers in the country doesn’t make every right decision.  But making the correct choices in what you can control and starting from the bottom can be the best decision you’ve made.   Quick money making schemes, get rich quick decision making, and living outside your means are all factors that have put the country in the current financial crisis.  Learning from our mistakes won’t correct our wrongs, but can protect yourself from being a part of it.

There is currently a belief that financial risk is easily measured. That we can stick some sort of risk-meter into the financial system and get an precise measurement of the risk of complex financial instruments. The poorly misguided belief that this risk-meter exists plays a key role in getting the financial system into the mess it is in. Of course, nothing has been learned. In a sense, we are trying to put wings on pigs and throwing them up in the air.  (Don’t try this at home, I am a professional trained pig tosser)  Risk sensitivity is expected to play a key role both in the future regulatory system and new areas such as executive compensation. Read More »

Every so often, accountants get asked some dumb questions.  Some of the questions I’ve received are “I never signed up for insurance, so why does medicare keeps getting deducted from my check?”  Or “can I get paid in cash so I don’t have to pay my child support?”  Even ones like “I don’t have a social security card/passport/drivers license, but can I use my friends information?”  Although with all the dumb questions, we even get some great questions.  Like “what is the difference between Finance & Accounting” like I answered before.  So now I’ll answer the next best question I’ve ever received, “what’s the difference between Venture Capitalists and Angel Investors?”

Startup companies want to attract both angel investors (Angels)  and venture capital funds (VCs).  Well that is of course if they need to.  Some are lucky enough to have Uncle Mike or are smart enough to lie cheat and steal the capital they need.  If not, they go the other way of trying to raise capital, Angels and VCs.  They provide the capital necessary for getting a small company off the ground and allows them to concentrate on business and not cash flow.  Although Angels and VCs serve a similar purpose, there are important differences between the two.

Definitions

Angel investors are private investors who invest in smaller companies. Even though some Angels are organized into networks or groups and pool investments, most Angels generally invest by themselves.

Venture capital fund is different because it is a substantial pooled investment, drawing on numerous wealthy investors.

Attracting Investments

Since Angels act privately, they vary in investment areas take on investments on a case by case basis.  VCs focus on emerging markets like technologies and software companies, and have greater amount of accountability for investments.  So Angels typically are easier to attract because they can be “talked into it” essentially, but VCs often have many more objectives to match and therefore harder to confirm.

Investment Focus

Angels focus on early stage company types, and concentrate on expanding the company with the angel’s investment to a more attractive size toward VCs. VCs do invest in the earlier stages, but venture capital funds also invest with the purpose of taking the company to the IPO stage and stay with the company for long term investments.  VCs, depending on the deal made, either take a cash pay-out or continue with the investment and take a back row seat on getting a higher ROI for what they have helped create.

Investment Size

Angel investors typically invest under $1 million.  There is no set guidelines as some have invested millions upon millions and some just invest a few thousand.  There is no form to fill out or group to join.  Anybody willing to give you money and meet the definitions is considered and Angel investor.   An Angels investment is used to expand the company to the size that attracts larger venture capital investments, mostly above $1 million.

Expected Returns

Both Angels and VCs tend to want a high ROI for their investments to help offset their frequent losses.  Although compared to one another, Angels often expect a slower, smaller return on investments than venture capital fund.  Sometimes Angels are not only in it for the money, therefore it’s the other driver that helps give the Angel more patience.  VCs have one purpose, and that’s to maximize their investment.  I’m not saying that all VCs are cold hearted @$$’s but they are not there to be your friend.  Truthfully neither are the Angels, but they are not given the name “Angel” investors for nothing.  They are there because they want to be there and want create something special.

All in all, you need to make sure of your expectations and your investors expectations before you move into any contract with an investor.  This isn’t just common sense, it’s also common practice to protect yourself and the employees of the company.  The last thing anyone wants, especially in this economy, is to have doubts about the company.  The great thing is that even WITH this economy, there are still plenty of Angels and VCs out there willing to help.  So go out there, spread the word, pitch your idea, and go make millions!!!

Since my experience with start-ups began a few years back, I have seen many examples of top-down forecasting that has left many venture capitalists wondering if the speaker had any credibility whatsoever.  Top-down forecasting is taking the market level from it’s highest point and working down to come up with your sales figures. Read More »

From time to time, I have found it of great value to share and embrace other start-ups and ingenius business ideas.  With that being said, I have come across a fabulous team from Australia that is making waves on their side of the world with a new business venture that I am sure will be successful.  We have offered to trade blogs with the hopes of reaching untapped markets and otherwise hard to reach audiences.  Please take a few moments to read about BizCover.com and their great business model. Read More »

As finance executives are having a hard time finding the silver lining in the credit crisis, its no wonder that the recent problems on Wall Street have forced them to revisit their bank relationships, redo their forecasting, rethink their cash management strategy, and worry a lot more about what tomorrow will bring. But under the gloomy talk lies some good news for the future of CFOs, their careers. As the executives most in tune with what’s going on in the economy and how the crippled credit markets affect their organization, CFOs are once again in the spotlight after all the high-profile financial meltdowns. Read More »

Fantastic!  The SEC issued an interpretation of an accounting standard that could make it easier for banks to report smaller losses, or perhaps even profits, when they announce results for the third quarter, which ended Tuesday.

So far, the move on Tuesday drew praise from the ABA, which whined to the SEC that auditors were forcing banks to value assets at drastically low “fire sale” prices, and rather than at the higher values the banks believe the assets should be worth in an orderly market. Read More »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.